Public transit and politics in Metro Vancouver

The Premier of British Columbia, Christy Clark, has expressed her intention to audit Metro Vancouver’s transportation authority and reduce operating costs.

Regional mayors went out on a limb last year with apparent provincial support, approving a $70 million supplementary transit plan with a $30 million revenue shortfall.  New revenues were to be identified in 2012, but the process has become  messy.  The Premier’s statement, offered without backup documentation, can be seen as a poke at the mayors and TransLink staff.   She is clearly banking on the belief that public opinion is on her side.

TransLink’s Council of Mayors is an advisory body that is asked to “renew and provide input” on annual base plans and long-term plans, and to approve or reject supplemental plans, but not design them.  [When I first posted this item, I wrote that the mayors approve the TransLink budget, but this is not quite true.] The Council includes powerful and capable people; as a collective, however, it has operated without an effective  strategy or media relations plan.  The seeming subsitute for a strategy is to float  revenue ideas and watch them die. Simultaneously, the mayors have made noises about seeking more power within the TransLink structure.

The question of who is responsible for the low status of the Mayors’ Council within TransLink is an interesting one: the Council’s  page on the transportation authority website is devoid of policy content, strategic content or public engagement tools; the Council’s February 2012 public meeting was one hour long, with  twenty minutes devoted to talking about holding meetings and ten minutes to say hello and goodbye.

The Premier, meanwhile, faces profound political challenges. A provincial general  election is scheduled in spring 2013; current polling suggests that the government will likely be defeated by the New Democratic Party.  The Premier’s response has been to shift to the right and position the BC Liberals as the party of low taxes.

In her statement, at a news conference called for a different purpose, the Premier offered no details on terms of reference for the TransLink audit.  However, she pre-judged the outcome,  rejecting any new TransLink revenue-raising and saying the $30 million needed to fund last year’s supplementary plan will come from internal  savings.  Some mayors have expressed dismay,  but it should be noted that audit-in-lieu-of-tax-increases came first from Dianne Watts of Surrey. The mayors requested an audit (as well as more revenue opportunities and more powers) in a letter sent just days before the Premier’s statement.

TransLink is a regional agency in a multi-municipality county.  Municipal leaders can claim that the transit authority controlled by the Province, and provincial leaders can claim it’s a hostage to municipal interests.  There’s generalized pro-transit sentiment among soft urbanists, but there’s no effective regional or provincial lobby for transit as there is for education, health or the environment.  TransLink has always been an easy target for the New Democratic Party that created it in 1998, and for the Liberal Party that has run B.C. since 2001. In fact, the Liberals reorganized TransLink in 2007 to create a governing board of provincial appointees, still in place today.  The  reorganization was greeted with enthusiasm by some, including Jordan Bateman, then a BC Liberal activist and a member of a municipal council demanding more transit for the suburbs.  Today he’s B.C. director of a prominent lobby group called the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. [2016 note: Bateman campaigned hard against a tax increase for transit in the Metro Vancouver 2015 plebiscite.]

The vice-chair of the Mayor’s Council, Peter Fassbender of the City of Langley, has urged calm in several media appearances, attempting to strike a thoughtful and consistent tone against a noisy background.  Fassbender says current rapid transit construction is not threatened, and a report from the independent Transit Commissioner will likely identify savings before an audit can even get started.  In an interview, he said, “Let’s slow down a little bit and make sure everyone understands the legal framework and what’s going on before we jump off any cliffs.”

** Note added on March 27, 2012: In other blog posts written around this topic, Gordon Price noted that there have been several TransLink audits over the past decade, and they have clearly not saved the transit authority from criticism.  Paul Hillson wrote in Civic Surrey that the Council of Mayors is exploring the question of whether the supplementary transit plan (including new service to south of Fraser) will have to be cut back.

** 2013 note: Peter Fassbender agreed to stand as a Liberal candidate in the 2013 election, a seemingly reckless move at the time; he was elected in a winning cause, and was appointed to serve as B.C.’s Minister of Education.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: