Family incomes in Metro Vancouver

Yaletown, 2017

Statistics Canada has added new community profiles to its website based on the 2016 census. These include income measures the federal Conservative government axed from the 2011 census — possibly because open up a discussion about economic inequality.

Within Metro Vancouver, the highest median family income, in North Vancouver District, is 50 per cent higher than in Richmond, which has the lowest family and individual incomes and the biggest low-income population (“federal Low-income measure, after tax”).

I’ve pasted a few numbers below for Metro Vancouver and selected towns in the rest of B.C. Some thoughts:

  • Readers may be surprised by the high median incomes in no-prestige suburbs such as Pitt Meadow and Maple Ridge. These high median incomes are related, in my view, to the prevalence of professionals, managers and two-income public sector families (a police officer married to a nurse) in those communities.
  • Every high-income district has low-income people, reflecting (in part) the presence of seniors living on public pensions. This is especially noticeable in affluent West Vancouver, which has a high number of seniors.
  • Incomes are not related to home prices. East Vancouver has a high incidence of poverty (as shown for example in the 2014 Child Poverty Report Card) but much higher housing costs than Langley Township or Maple Ridge.
  • Incomes outside Metro Vancouver are perhaps slightly lower than in the big city, but not drastically. Terrace and Prince George, for example, have struggled for decades with forest-sector job losses, but obviously benefit from the presence of colleges, hospitals and provincial government offices.

Incomes reported in the above table are from 2015.

In its community profiles, Statistics Canada reports in almost obsessive detail on the languages spoken. My takeaway here is that while close to 30 per cent of British Columbians are immigrants, fewer than 20 per cent report that they speak a language other than English at home. There are few cases where any non-English language achieves even a 10 per cent share of languages spoken at home. These are:

Richmond: c. 35 per cent Chinese
Burnaby: c. 20 per cent Chinese
Abbotsford: c. 18 per cent Punjabi
Surrey: c. 15 per cent Punjabi
City of Vancouver: c. 15 per cent Chinese
Coquitlam: c. 13 per cent Chinese
West Van District: c. 10 per cent Chinese

At Richmond Centre, 2013

Riding Vancouver’s fast train to nowhere

Adam Fitch’s rapid transit map. His LRT line idea is shown with a cord painted green, from a proposed new Emily Carr SkyTrain station in east False Creek to UBC. The red line, with marked stations, traces TransLink’s SkyTrain route plan as of about 2012. In the real world, stations from Arbutus are to go into service before 2025; stations west of Arbutus have been delayed indefinitely.

My thanks to Kamloops-based planner Adam Fitch. He invited me to join him on a May 4 “Jane’s Walk” to consider a cheaper alternative to the Broadway Extension rapid transit project.

Fitch’s proposal would take advantage of a corridor owned by the City of Vancouver, and would avoid most of the tunneling costs associated with the Broadway scheme. It’s an entertaining concept, but it won’t get built, largely because it won’t take people where they want to go.

TransLink’s Broadway Extension, previously referred to on this site as the Arbutus Line, is an approved project that will extend the Millennium SkyTrain line from Clark Drive to Arbutus Street in Vancouver. Scheduled to begin construction in something like 2021, most of it would be underground.

Federal and provincial governments have promised to fund the Broadway Extension, but costs are rising. TransLink announced on April 30 that rising property values, among other issues, have driven the estimated cost to $2.83 billion, up from the $2.28 billion estimate provided in 2015.

Photo from the Public Transit in Ottawa blog.

Adam Fitch proposes a less expensive above-ground light rail system (with short tunnel segments) to reach the University of British Columbia, using trains similar to those that are now in service in Ottawa. He says his cheaper option hasn’t been seriously considered for Vancouver because it wouldn’t deliver the same high-rise development profits as SkyTrain (see Metrotown, Brentwood, Surrey Central, etc.), and because SkyTrain has a big-city glamour that voters like.

The Fitch light rail route would run west along the abandoned False Creek streetcar right-of-way, owned by the City of Vancouver, and then west and south along the former Canadian Pacific rail corridor, purchased by the City in 2016 after years of litigation. It would turn west on 16th Avenue and proceed to UBC.

Fitch says the construction could be completed for one-quarter of the cost and in one-quarter of the time of the Broadway Extension. He says the total travel time for his trains to run from False Creek to Arbutus would be just two minutes longer than the comparable ride on SkyTrain. The surface trains stop more often, but SkyTrain passengers would need to ride an escalator up from the depths to reach their station, while LRT passengers are already at grade.

Jane’s Walkers on the Arbutus transit corridor just west of Fir.

Tax consultant Robert Smarz and I joined Fitch and six other tourists to walk the section of Fitch’s line from Granville Island to Broadway and Arbutus. We noticed that like a lot of big thinkers, Fitch falls short in the organizational department. In five years of campaigning he hasn’t managed any online posts to promote his proposal. The rolled-up cloth map shown at the top of this page was the only illustration available for Voony’s Blog when that site commented on the Fitch proposal in 2013, and it is the only easily accessible resource today.

Blogmeister Voony’s immediate reaction in 2013 was the same as mine in 2018: “Adam’s proposal apparently assumes that the main demand is on UBC. It is worth to mention that the numbers ran by Translink suggests that the highest demand is on the central Broadway portion.

Fitch led a series of Jane’s walks in 2014 to boost his idea, and blogger Steven Rees invited readers to comment. “Rico” seized on the same point as Voony had a year earlier.

“I suspect the route would be cheaper to build but with central Broadway being 2/3s of projected ridership it seems pretty obvious to me that a route that does not serve central Broadway will have a higher cost per rider, or new rider, than even a fully tunnelled Skytrain, with way less benifits. Build it right, build it where the demand is.”

“MB”, whose comments on the Broadway Extension were featured on this site in 2015, scoffed at the Fitch proposal because it wouldn’t serve riders and because it ignores cost issues related to utility relocation.

“But oh yes, this tram line would still be a “bargain” compared to a subway on Broadway. Well, that’s not a comment that can be applied to Adam Fitch’s route because it avoids the transit demand of Broadway altogether, which just happens to exceed the demand for UBC.

I don’t know why tram aficionados are incapable of conducting research to back their ideas. A cursory Internet search would have turned up examples from all over the world where surface rail transit costs escalated with the relocation of underground utilities. Edinburgh council had to absorb a 200 million pounds sterling cost overrun and years of delays for this very reason.”

The Arbutus corridor, now owned by the City of Vancouver, at Broadway. This section of pathway is heavily used by pedestrians. In the Adam Fitch concept it would sit above a kilometre-long streetcar tunnel.

New detached home, Arbutus corridor at Cypress: welcome to Kitsilano

I like the Fitch proposal, in a sentimental way. I would like to think that at-grade transit is better than SkyTrain when it comes to supporting neighbourhoods, although the evidence is mixed. (Calgary has a 40-year old LRT system, with limited land use benefits; Metro Vancouver has enjoyed a few SkyTrain oriented successes, notably Joyce-Collingwood and Coquitlam Central-Lafarge Lake.) The Fitch line would offer a pleasant ride across the west side of Vancouver.

But it would not do what the new SkyTrain extension promises to do, which is to deliver SkyTrain passengers to the Canada Line near City Hall, and bring commuters by the thousands to Broadway corridor employment centres like the Vancouver General Hospital. Fitch says those commuters could hike the 600 metres up the hill from False Creek. I think not.

The City of Vancouver, by the way, has not written off the idea of light rail or a streetcar  along the Arbutus Corridor. The future line would ignore UBC and continue far to the south, to Marpole. City planners provided drawings as the basis for a citizen “design jam” in 2017. The status of this set of drawings is not clear (to me), and neither is the proposed date for construction.

 

 

Funding for Metro Vancouver transit: are we there yet?

Surrey Central SkyTrain station

Over the past 20 years, British Columbia and local governments have failed to agree on a long-term transit funding formula for Metro Vancouver.

The regional transit authority (TransLink) sits in a governmental neutral zone, neither provincial nor local, and it suffers for a lack of political champions. Continue reading

Your own pond at New Westminster Quay

Fountain and pond south of Quayside Drive, New Westminster

With its Riverfront Vision, the City of New Westminster is building a zone that will attract visitors from around the region, in the same way that Fort Langley and White Rock have become local destinations.

30 years after the establishment of the high-density Quayside neighbourhood, tower construction continues near the public market.

This marks a new push in a 30-year-old program to transform the city’s trackside industrial waterfront. The market building at New Westminster Quay was constructed in the 1980s, on a public market model that has failed in many places (Surrey, Calgary, Robson Street in Vancouver). The Quay struggled for many years, but the residential densification of New West’s downtown has brought new customers, along with the conversion of part of the market building to office and meeting space. Continue reading

Apartment development in Surrey: crowdfunding as a doorway to home ownership

Tower construction seen from alongside the proposed new development on 104 Avenue, Surrey

I recently joined our friend David Plug on a real estate investors’ bus tour around Surrey Central. The tour’s purpose was to encourage passengers to commit at least $25,000 in financing for a proposed apartment housing complex.

With a large number of smallish investments, the development company hopes to raise at least $7.5 million, a big chunk of the estimated $13.5 million cost of purchasing land. The project prospectus lays out three scenarios. In the minimum scenario, under present City of Surrey zoning, the builders would construct 210 units in a 6-storey wood-frame complex; with revised zoning, they might achieve 359 units, and a higher rate of return to investors. Continue reading

A quick look at Sunshine Hills

This is a perfect suburban neighbourhood in conventional terms: single-family homes distributed along nested crescents, tall trees, tranquility. Watershed Park sits on the southern edge, a wide patch of rain forest with a fine network of trails. There are no hills in Sunshine Hills, but the park slopes down to the coastal plain and provides a buffer against the noise from Highway 99, the route to Seattle (south) or Vancouver (north).

You can walk from most of Sunshine Hills to the shops at Scott Road and 64th in 20 minutes or less.  The area plan, published by the municipality of Delta in 2015, makes it Sunshine Hills Centre reducedclear there is no intention to create a more explicitly walkable ring of medium-density housing around the commercial area. The residents seem to like things as they are. We did not see a single “For Sale” sign during our visit. Continue reading

Vancouver’s Chinatown: heritage site, urban village, tourist zone

Gore Street at Keefer in Vancouver’s Chinatown.

Vancouver City Council voted in November 2017 to seek World Heritage Site status for the Chinatown district. This founding neighbourhood began as a segregated zone for Chinese-speaking labourers and merchants outside the railway and lumber camp that covered today’s Waterfront and Gastown areas.  It functioned for many decades as a commercial and cultural hub for Chinese-speaking immigrants, and takes a prominent place in the modern English-language literature of  the Chinese-Canadian community. The retail hub, it should be said, has been supported by apartment housing, Chinese seniors’ housing and small-lot detached housing, either in the core or in the old Strathcona neighbourhood to the east. Continue reading